A couple of weeks ago I tweeted
something about splits and armchair ticks, this caused immediate, and
understandable confusion amongst the myriad of tyro birders on the patch. By
way of an apology I thought I would offer this quick guide to bird species and
the listing thereof.
|
Charles Darwin |
|
Archbishop Ussher |
According to the Genesis account
Birds appeared during the fifth great epoch (n.b. not 24 hour day, which,
thanks to being misled by the clergy of his day, led Darwin to his first wrong
assumption and to write the dullest
book in the world, I know I’ve read it) of creation, they were produced
according to their kind (n.b. not species. The second spanner that the clergy
of old threw into Darwin’s works) the writer offered no definition of a
‘kind’ but it would seem it was somewhere between what we now call an Order and
a Genus (see Taxonomic
Rank.)
|
Taxonomy |
All was well and everyone knew
what everything was but two things happened to throw the whole thing into a
state of confusion. Micro Evolution: Birds didn’t stay the same; within their
kinds they bred, spread abroad, became isolated and started to look a bit
different. Paradise Lost: Man had a few problems and Birdwatching took a bit of
a back seat. Listers (yes there have always been Listers) had to content
themselves with just 4 ticks. Big Bird, Little Bird, Pretty Bird and Nice
Sounding Bird. Note that identification was occasionally Aural but mostly
Visual.
A couple of thousand years on and
a new development occurred. Birds as food: This led to a doubling of the number
of species. Now in addition to the original 4 another 4 were available to the
keen Lister. Tastes Lovely, Tastes Alright, Tastes Funny (some authorities
added Smelt Funny but not everyone got that) and Tastes Disgusting. Sharp-eyed
readers will note this new advance in identification was partially Olfactory
but mostly Gustatory, little used techniques amongst the Lister of the 21st
century.
|
'Tastes Lovely' |
As part of their continuing slide
into stupidity mankind developed more effective ways of catching and killing
Birds, but this had an upside to the Lister. Now he (female Listers were not
out of the closet at this stage) was seeing Birds close up and in the hand all
sorts of variation was noticed and his list grew. Exponentially! As a corollary
to this new development a new element to the hobby of listing was born: The
List Police. Not everyone thought it was ethical to list dead Birds and this
led to much wrangling within the burgeoning Birding community. Tactile
identification was controversial.
|
The List Police |
By the 18th century
things were swinging back to the Visual/Aural techniques of old, especially
with the development of rudimentary visual enhancement devices. It was Gilbert
White, who with his brand new pair of ‘Zeiff 5x25 binocularff’ became the
father of the modern day Splitter. He noticed that the Bird previously known as
the ‘Little Green Bird’ didn’t all make the same noise, some went ‘piu, piu,
ptt, ptt, ptt, trrrrrrr’ others went ‘swi, swi, swi, wewewewee’ and others went
‘chiff-chaff, chiff-chaff’. He split the 1 Bird into 3, Listers went wild
everywhere! The first he called Wood Warbler as it warbled in the Woods, the
second he named Willow Warbler as it often chose to warble in a Willow, he wasn’t
really sure what to call the third.
|
Gilbert White |
Around the same time a Swedish
Zoologist named Linnaeus decided to codify all this stuff and so invented
Taxonomy (a sort of cross between stuffing animals and star-gazing). He decided
that the smallest divisible element of Birds would be the species and there
were quite a lot of them by now what with all the looking, shooting, touching,
sniffing and cooking that had been going on over the centuries. The world list
was somewhere around 1,000.
|
Carl Linnaeus |
The 18th century was of
course a time of imperialist expansionism, this led to more travel, exposure to
more birds, and also, a sort of pre-cursor to the cold war arms race but with
Birds as the weapon of choice. By the time of the first World War there were
20,000 species of Bird as each empire had to have more than the other, Listers
were ecstatic but things had clearly got out of hand, the Listing Police (in
association with the League of Nations) stepped in and scaled the whole thing
back down to 8,600.
|
League of Nations |
Listers were not to be outdone,
they (a few women had joined the men, now they had been emancipated. In fact it
was often thought, mistakenly, that Emily Davison had thrown herself in protest
under the Kings Horse when in fact she had spotted a rarity on the other side
of Epsom racecourse that she needed for her London List) worked surreptitiously
on new technologies and new techniques that would ensure future growth to their
pared down Lists.
|
Emily Davison |
One surprisingly obvious ‘new’
development was to actually go and look for Birds, Birdwatching evolved into
Birding, Birders went to stay at Bird Observatories, all the better to observe
Birds. Lists grew, but more was needed! New areas were pioneered, Scilly,
Shetland, Boats, the Zoo (don’t worry the Listing Police were all over that, if
you can’t tick dead stuff you certainly can’t tick stuff behind bars, stuff
recently escaped from behind bars still causes problems) but List growth was
stalling.
|
Questar |
Two things happened almost
simultaneously, 1) Birders commandeered Astronomical Telescopes, e.g. Questars and,
2) Guru’s were invented. Legendary Birders such as Peter Grant, Killian
Mullarney and, more recently, the famed Ma-tan
Ga’ana started to notice, with these superior optics, that there were whole
tracts of feathers that nobody previously had realised existed. Many of these
tracts were actually ever so (ever so) slightly different from those of Birds
that had formerly been considered the same species, the Split was well and
truly here to stay.
|
Ma-tan Ga'ana |
Similar progress has been made in
the Aural department with the likes of the Sound
Approach gang leading the way in espousing that, ‘stuff that sounds
different probably is different.’ Split,
Split, Split. But. ‘Of course’, I hear you say, ‘this is all the same old same
old, If it looks different, sounds different (okay, not much has been done with
the whole sniff & scratch approach lately but I’m sure it’s due a
resurgence) blah, blah, blah’. But wait!
|
The Sound Approach |
Up until now most of this
Splitting lark (not Splitting Lark) has relied on tangible perceptions of what
Birds are but modern technology has stepped in with the likes of Prof. Martin Collinson
and his ilk who made the Watsonian,
or should that be Crickian(?) discovery that if you chop Birds in two it reveals
a barcode (such is my understanding) that rather like Blackpool Rock tells you
what the Bird actually is, and guess what, yes, loads of identical stuff is in
reality totally different. Splitters were euphoric and apoplectic in equal
measure, the goal of 20,000 ticks seemed as if it were within reach again but,
by a cruel twist of fate, no one would be able to reach it without the
assistance of a crazed scientist.
|
Dr. Strangelove |
|
Prof. Martin Collinson |
Wither to now, you ask? I suspect
that a large leap forward in technology is our only hope, someone needs to
invent a Birdscanning device capable of detecting minute differences between
hither to undifferentiated species. 40,000 species awaits, will you rise to the
challenge?
@birdingprof
Oh, and as for Armchair Ticks, you can get fumigation products to sort them out #rentokill
No comments:
Post a Comment